Hextraction Not Enough Basic Tiles
158 downloads · 3 years ago · I generated all possible combinations of the three basic lines on a tile.
The rotational duplicates
This model is restricted by licensing terms.
View license.
I generated all possible combinations of the three basic lines on a tile.
The rotational duplicates are removed but it contains the mirrored duplicates, so you do not have to mirror tiles you like yourself.
This model is restricted by licensing terms.
View license.
.png&w=3840&q=75)
.png&w=3840&q=75)





.png&w=3840&q=75)
![[Hextraction] Basic Tile Prints in Vase Mode 3d model](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstorage.googleapis.com%2Fproduction-thangs-public%2Fuploads%2Fattachments%2F6f37c90e-baaa-411f-acc9-9eadb3354dd6%2Fphoto_2023-07-06_13-41-10.jpg&w=3840&q=75)




There are 223 of the non-tiles that Flabort mentioned. These appear to be a program bug that generated them. Trivial to get rid of by sorting by size and dropping anything below 5kb.
Nice work! Some look like good funky templates for "jerk tile"-style effect tiles with room for text.
I just wish the top edges weren't so stabby and that there weren't triangles perched on thin sticks (e.g. 0x4903 demonstrates both issues). Are those "standard" tunnel shapes? The top edges look sharper than usual to me. In any case, at least the pointy edges could do with rounding. And some models are broken, just one triangle or so.
My observations took up more space than will fit in a comment box, so here's my comment in a pastebin: https://pastebin.com/KiavdAaD
Summary: Some tiles are just triangles, not tiles. Some have fragile pegs. There's some I want to print. Where is 0x0555 or 0x0a95 or the equivalent to such?